What do epistemic logic and cognitive science have to do with each other?
نویسنده
چکیده
Epistemic logic is a multi-faceted theory aimed at targeting notions such as knowledge, belief, information, awareness, memory and other propositional attitudes, by means of logical and semantical tools. These concepts ought to be in the spotlight of cognitive science too, but the two have not yet seriously been explored in cooperation. In this paper, it is shown that a number of possibilities is opened up by attempting to answer the question of what epistemic logic and cognitive science have to do with each other. Among the proposed answers are: (i) new quantified versions of multi-agent epistemic logic capture locutions involving object identification, giving rise to applications in representing knowledge in multi-agent systems and parallel processing. (ii) The framework of game-theoretic semantics for the ensuing logics enjoys increased cognitive plausibility as the true semantics for epistemic notions. (iii) Several recent findings in cognitive neuroscience pertaining to the notions of awareness and explicit versus implicit processing contribute to logical studies. These three connections are explored here from both logical and cognitive perspectives. Reflecting neuroscientific research, new extensions of epistemic logic are defined, increasing formal understanding of unconscious and unaware information processing in the brain, and making the formalism thus amenable to knowledge representation in multi-agent configurations. 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Logic and Social Cognition - The Facts Matter, and so do Computational Models
This article takes off from Johan van Benthem’s ruminations on the interface between logic and cognitive science in his position paper “Logic and reasoning: Do the facts matter?”. When trying to answer Van Benthem’s question whether logic can be fruitfully combined with psychological experiments, this article focuses on a specific domain of reasoning, namely higherorder social cognition, includ...
متن کاملLogic in the Lab
As humans, we live in a remarkably complex social environment. One cognitive tool which helps us manage all this complexity is our theory of mind, the ability to reason about the mental states of others. By deducing what other people want, feel and think, we can understand their actions, predict how our actions will influence them, and decide how we should behave to be successful. Theory of min...
متن کاملA Logic for Social Influence through Communication
We propose a two dimensional “social network plausibility framework” to model doxastic influence through communication in a social network. To do so, we combine two approaches: on the one hand, a hybrid logic setting, to model the social network itself (who is related to whom), and on the other hand, dynamic epistemic logic, to model the distribution of beliefs among agents (who believes what) ...
متن کاملWhat will they say? - Public Announcement Games
Dynamic epistemic logics describe the epistemic consequences of actions. Public announcement logic, in particular, describe the consequences of public announcements. As such, these logics are descriptive – they describe what agents can do. In this paper we discuss what rational agents will or should do. We consider situations where each agent has a goal, a typically epistemic formula he or she ...
متن کاملThe Geometry of Knowledge
The most widely used attractive logical account of knowledge uses standard epistemic models, i.e., graphs whose edges are indistinguishability relations for agents. In this paper, we discuss more general topological models for a multi-agent epistemic language, whose main uses so far have been in reasoning about space. We show that this more geometrical perspective affords greater powers of dist...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive Systems Research
دوره 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003